<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010</title>
<link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone notice this part: "swappable SIM cards will not be able to be used in devices not certified by Big Red"<br><br>In a stereotypical Verizon fashion, they will attempt to lock the devices down, again. <br><br>What is the freakin logic in doing so? What do they seriously gain by doing that? This is a classic bean counter oriented move.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JKL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 10:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[If US wireless companies operated in Europe, they would have been fined and legislated into submission by now. Not here. We have clowns who still believe government regulation is bad. Therefore, the private sector should 'regulate themselves'. <br><br>End Result, monopolies like Verizon and the failure of the free market. We have a country of 300 mill with only 4 major cell carriers. While other countries with 1/15 our population have 5 or 6 major cell carriers and are providing 20+ mb data services. Lets not forget services like two way video calling. Which for consumers in the US, is still at the science fiction stage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JKL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course, the countries with two-way video calling and higher speed networks than we have also have far less land mass to cover. How hard is it to provide wireless coverage to the major population centers in Japan, for example? We have regional carriers in the US that have to cover far larger footprints than many national carriers overseas.<br><br>The financial investment required to be a major carrier in the US is far more than in the UK or most other European countries. That's why there's only four here, not because of magical government regulation. I'm fairly sure you can't consider a company with three major competitors a monopoly, anyways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who said they had to provide these features in every single cell zone? As it stands, they already don't. Just look at AT&T's 3G coverage map. Now lets compare any carrier in the states to the services of carriers operating in similar sized countries like Australia. Where 99% of their population has 3G coverage, with data rates approaching well over 21mb. We could even go down the handset route where we are severely limited by what the carriers choose. With a larger population we should have 5 times the handset choices of lets say the UK, yet we have less.<br><br>Economics 101. The more equipment a carrier buys the cheaper it is. So these 'population based' excuses simply hold no water. All large cities should have had the latest and greatest. Instead we have 3G networks that are a joke. You can compare a range of large cities or even smaller cities abroad and they usually have much better cell services. I actually achieve greater throughput using a sat service in NYC than I do on a AT&T or Verizon handset. Yet the same 3G handset overseas, in more densely populated cities, achieves 5 times the throughput. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gee, they'll only be about 80 markets behind WiMax...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skemme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah but no one really cares about wimax. LTE is the world standard, it sounds cooler, and sprint always makes bad decisions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MidnightDT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 11:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[100 markets vs maybe 30 with products from the likes of Cisco/Linksys (<a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/14/cisco-signs-on-to-provide-infrastructure-build-linksys-wimax-ro/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/05/14/cisco-signs-on-to-provide-infrastructure-build-linksys-wimax-ro/</a>) on worldwide standard (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX</a>). Backers like Google and Intel.<br><br>Other than a reseller, Sprint's not involved in the roll out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skemme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[You could be more on Skemme,<br><br>Verizon may be planing to implement an LTE network but we have no idea where, when, or any details. Sprint will have WiMax coverage rolled out to approximately 50 Million people with the announced cities they are implementing the service in through the end of 2010.<br><br>HTC, Samsung, Nokia, all have equipment that is released and being used NOW. <br><br>Dell just released 3 new laptops with built in WiMax (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/06/dell-injects-wimax-into-trio-of-laptops/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/06/dell-injects-wimax-into-trio-of-laptops/</a>), Acer, Toshiba, Lenovo also have or are building WiMax equipped laptops.<br><br>Yes, LTE will be world standard someday (maybe by like 2015 by the time all the networks are built out) but WiMax will also be a world standard and is already being built out at a faster rate, I don't know why people have such a hard time understanding this. I mean if 130 out of approximately 200 countries have or plan to have WiMax networks within the next couple of years, How can we not say this won't be a world standard.<br><br>People just love to bash Sprint for any reason, yeah Sprint has many problems, but lets not pretend they are the only ones in the world involved in creating a WiMax 4G network and crucify them for this decision. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem with Sprint and their so-called 4G is quite simple to define. Where the hell is it? Oh wait, Baltimore. What a great roll out, not. Fios is being rolled out faster than sprint / clearwire whoever's 4G network.<br><br>So this rhetoric that they are rolling out to 130 cities has zero credibility. We'll have 5G networks and sprint will still be 'rolling out their 4G network'. <br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to start somewhere. BAWA was the jumping off point for PCS too and lo, it managed to become the first all digital nationwide network. Now it's the fastest, most dependable 3G network. Yes, even above VZ.(<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111989/the-definitive-coast+to+coast-3g-data-test" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5111989/the-definitive-coast+to+coast-3g-data-test</a>).<br><br>I could list the remainder of the cities coming online, but you'll just complain that it's not here now because you have no understanding of the undertaking and capital involved in moving to a whole new architecture. ATT and T-Mobile are STILL rolling out their 3G networks and you're complaining about a company working on 4G - <a href="http://blip.tv/file/1778457" rel="nofollow">http://blip.tv/file/1778457</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Skemme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[My exact point was people just love to bash Sprint for no reason, case and point,<br><br>Looking at the comparison below,<br><br>Sprint is rolling out their 4G network through 2010 and is actually LIVE NOW in Bmore/Portland.<br><br>Verizon/Att are talking about how they will roll LTE sometime soon but no real definitive plans have been released and is no further than beta testing if anything.<br><br>TMobile is just rolling out their 3G network now.<br><br>So since there are no other wireless companies that have a 4G network in the US we have people like Dan who will just compare a LAND service like Verizon's Fios for the sake of ease.<br><br>But wait, Fios only reaches 12.5 Million people as of this year and is only going to reach 23 million by 2010 (<a href="http://247wallst.com/2007/02/23/verizon_shares_/" rel="nofollow">http://247wallst.com/2007/02/23/verizon_shares_/</a>), compared to Sprint who is providing a MOBILE Solution that yes is only released in Bmore/Portland but with the other announced cities, Sprint will have a combined reach of over 50 million people on their 4G network by 2010. Hmm lets see, Fios began the buildout around 2007 and by 2010 Fios will be at 23 million compared to Sprint who just began their buildout last year and will reach 50 million people by 2010? Looks like Sprint 4G network will actually out pace Verizon's land based Fios. <br><br>I love the comment "we'll have 5G networks by the time Sprint's done rolling out their 4G network", lol on what basis? Who else in the US has even begun building out a 4G network?<br><br>Great Point Dan!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually it's a great point. Sprint has been promising a 4G network for years now. Yet we're still waiting. Then they throw out more promises and you expect us to believe them. You do realize that LTE is going to absolutely destroy WIMAX. The technology is so new it is still being developed. Once Verizon and AT&T start those roll outs, it's game over for wimax and their 2mb, sorry 6mb, data service. As it stands HSDPA easily surpasses any live wimax service. I have easily clocked 14mb using it overseas. <br><br>But anyway, Wimax is a moronic choice of technology to deploy in here, considering the large area it needs to cover. One would have thought that Sprint learned a thing or two from their mistake of choosing 1900mhz to operate on. <br><br>Why would I be bashing sprint? Sprint is company offering a service and is rightfully judged on it as well as their customer service. Clearly they fail in both. Though it is funny to look at any sprint forum only to see their users fighting over sero plans and other cheap discounts. The other carriers obviously don't want those types of customers. <br><br>The point about FIOS is that a fiber optic cable that is physically being installed into the ground, is being rolled out faster than a wireless network. That is a disgrace. Though I don't blame them entirely. Considering that cable companies now own part of that wimax network, Verizon and AT&T have nothing to worry about. They'll stuff it up like they stuff everything they touch up. And then try to overcharge people for it. Cementing their future in chapter 11.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 10:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[what i dont get is if LTE is going to be the world standard, but verizon still lockis out there devices to work only in there own network, whats so special of verizon LTE? if you cant use LTE as a world standard dont call it that? where is the world in that. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[They might as well just stick to what they do best. Severely limiting service. As you said, why even bother going to a world standard if you are only going to restrict what people can or cannot use. They should just pull a TDMA and use their own standard. <br><br>I am sure it will be some sort of lame excuse like 'trying to maintain network integrity'. <br><br>It would be like Shell saying only xyz brand cars are permitted to use our fuel. Regardless of the fact that most vehicles manufactured to run on 87 octane. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 15th 2009 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pull a TDMA and use their own standard? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 20th 2009 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Besides 1,900MHz, let's not forget the genius decision to merge with that iDen carrier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crunch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2009 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon Wireless to light up LTE in 20 to 30 markets in 2H 2010]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/verizon-wireless-to-light-up-lte-in-20-to-30-markets-in-2h-2010/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow I'm always surprised at the slow-rollout of wireless tech in the US and network locking of devices.<br><br>I live in South Africa, we've had 3G networks and two-way video calling for about 5 years now I think. 3.5G networks for at least 3. Mobile operators are at about 7.2mbps and most contract phones that you receive support this.<br><br>Nobody uses video calling anyway, it's gimmick.<br><br>Also here it's illegal to network lock devices. iPhone's are not locked, I use mine on a competing network without issue.<br><br>Anyway at least you guys have a much better cable, fixed line setup. We're behind on this.<br><br>Also sure the US does have a huge land mass to cover, South Africa is not that small either though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LucasGo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2009 3:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>