http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Nokia and Intel collaborating on new Linux-based phone OS called oFono http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/
It will be compatible with "multiple linux distributions"

This needs to be changed]]>May 15th 2009 2:27PMhttp://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/May 15th 2009 3:03PMhttp://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/
Why can't Nokia simply use Android on their devices and get on with it? What's their point in absolutely having to own the software?

Android is open-source and free, so Nokia should just improve on it and customize it. It's not GPL3 Gnu, so they can take it, customize it, improve it and not share their improvements with competitors.]]>May 15th 2009 4:34PMhttp://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/15/nokia-and-intel-collaborating-on-new-linux-based-phone-os-called/
From my point of view (and i know really well winmo, symbian, the iphone and android - i only lack blackberry knowledge) this brand has a real value making full featured quality - a word samsung, lg and htc should learn - phones. They may not be the sexiest ones out there, but they are definitly the best compromise between features, reliability, efficiency and quality. Their two main problems are their marketing department, if it even exists, and their interfaces design center even if thing are being solved there.]]>May 16th 2009 10:45AM