<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Japan, China talking about tie-up for 3G and LTE networks</title>
<link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/03/japan-china-talking-about-tie-up-for-3g-and-lte-networks/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Japan, China talking about tie-up for 3G and LTE networks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Japan, China talking about tie-up for 3G and LTE networks]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/03/japan-china-talking-about-tie-up-for-3g-and-lte-networks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2009/05/03/japan-china-talking-about-tie-up-for-3g-and-lte-networks/</guid><description><![CDATA[The LTE Technoloogy  of Japan is the same of any other LTE. In fact since LTE is still a "3G standard" (as defined by ITU on the IMT-2000) the term 3.9G is much more accurate than 4G. To be a "4G standard" the technology must serve 1Gbps in nomadic environments (as defined by ITU on the IMT-Advanced). Only LTE-Advanced and Wimax-m are candidates technologies to apply to IMT-Advanced and hence apply for a "4G" name.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daydalaus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>