Sounds to me like even if it were passed, it would be taken up under the 1st Amendment, because it probably could be construed as a violation of free speech. If "Predators" are really that big of a problem, by now they have discovered that camera phones (as a general rule) are lackluster compared to the other cheaply available technology and would probably pose as a "photographer." I think that there are FAR more serious problems in the nation at this moment than a minimal issue, but then again maybe everyone's just lying about the worst economic situation since the Great Depression and it's all an early April Fool's joke.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Michael @ Jan 27th 2009 12:50AM
Sounds to me like even if it were passed, it would be taken up under the 1st Amendment, because it probably could be construed as a violation of free speech. If "Predators" are really that big of a problem, by now they have discovered that camera phones (as a general rule) are lackluster compared to the other cheaply available technology and would probably pose as a "photographer." I think that there are FAR more serious problems in the nation at this moment than a minimal issue, but then again maybe everyone's just lying about the worst economic situation since the Great Depression and it's all an early April Fool's joke.