Confirmed: Google was naughty, broke App Store rules with iPhone app
Okay, any talk that consistency in Apple's approval process for the App Store has improved definitely has to be put on hold at this point; first we had that BdEmailer situation that duplicates functionality (albeit shoddily) of the iPhone's own email capabilities, and now we have official confirmation that Google did a no-no when it slipped its voice-powered search through the checkpoint. The problem is that enabling the automatic voice detection requires use of an undocumented API call for the proximity sensor that Apple neither guarantees nor approves use of, meaning firmware updates can break it at will. In and of itself, that's not a huge indiscretion on Google's part since they're probably committed to keeping it up-to-date, but the real issue is that this violates an explicit rule of the App Store that bans the use of undocumented calls. Apple, guys, seriously: if you want to be jerks about what gets through and what doesn't, fine -- but at least do it consistently so it doesn't look like you're favoring companies run by members of your own executive board (or in the case of BdEmailer, companies that are doing a bang-up job of making your own products look better).
[Via mocoNews]
[Via mocoNews]
























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
mphayvanh @ Nov 26th 2008 1:57PM
The bigger question is: Why is this not on the Android first?!
Xoyuji @ Nov 26th 2008 3:37PM
Good question; why not support your own product first
Sameer Surampalli @ Nov 26th 2008 6:12PM
Because Google isn't selfish like Apple and realizes that Apple has the bigger market share and wants to deliver to the customer...
We should probably see this quickly now on Android.
Chris @ Nov 26th 2008 5:35PM
Google > Apple
Meatloaf @ Nov 29th 2008 3:49PM
I think the real question is, when the hell is the android coming to sprint. I'll second that motion btw. Google > Apple
Azlo @ Dec 6th 2008 1:43PM
I would give an arm to get a Android powered phone for Sprint right now. I'll third that Google > Apple
SPOKE @ Nov 27th 2008 7:01AM
calm down engadgetmobile, its just a phone.
Tubeliar @ Nov 27th 2008 7:11AM
It's a party with a bouncer that won't let you in because you're wearing the wrong shoes.
christexaport @ Nov 27th 2008 2:21PM
You can take it lightly, but you'll only run off developers if there's a perception of different rules based on who you are. Why can Google do it, but Big In Japan or someone else can't? Apple is asleep at the wheel, trying to control everything, which will kill their momentum just like they did with their Mac PC's. Apple is retarded. Either their certification process is lax, or there's a privileged VIP group of developers with a separate set of rules, possibly tied to money. I'm sure all those developers would prefer the better Symbian or Android OS's anyway. You can access all API's equally and at once, regardless of the financial status or promises of the developer.
Rick @ Dec 2nd 2008 10:25AM
So Apple is being a jerk for filtering out what apps can and can not be avaialbe on their phone, running their software that may affect their sales/public image/product stability?
Wow, you must write for Engadget during the day. So the anti-mac virus is spreading through all of engadget's reporters now?
Soubrause @ Dec 5th 2008 9:06PM
Anti-mac is the antibody; the virus is pro-mac. Hopefully someday we will have an outright cure.