<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet</title>
<link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Android is so open, how come I'm forced to use Google's apps? How come I can't sync MY personal data with MY computers, only with Google's computers? Like Google doesn't have a shady record when it comes to privacy...<br><br>I agree with Mr. De la Vega. Android is still too closed and proprietary. Not worth the trouble.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RCC2k8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, he does have a point. Maybe this is why Sprint made the comments they did. They're waiting for it to be more open past Google.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveIsOnIt!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nah, Sprint just up and said Android sucked...I think at&t is attempting to get something out of Google here...and they probably won't, seeing how they bent over for Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[badqat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH.....I did forget the Apple factor. Well...that pretty much shot all chances. So damn...will only T-Mobile and maybe Verizon be Android carriers?? But to me (I know I'll get yelled at for this) it seems that Android fits with T-Mobile. It seems more of a 18-24 type OS...not really meant for anything serious like WinMo and Rim...and even Palm is meant for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveIsOnIt!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[What I've seen of Android thus far looks good.  Keep in mind, they're still basically a beta - and with the open source community behind them, I expect it to mature nicely, and eventually match or best efforts such as Windows Mobile, OS X on the iPhone, Symbian, etc.<br><br>Not going to deny you're absolutely correct that as of now, it's aimed squarely at hip, early adopter type folks...but there is a ton of potential there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[badqat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, what? <br><br>You can sync your data with your own computer, sir. Mysync is the app, IIRC. You can sync it with dang near any service right now, excepting Exchange, admittedly. But support for that is coming. <br><br>Android IS open. That's the whole point to it. And the apps aren't proprietary google, either. I use a wealth of non-google-produced apps. I also use some of their ADC apps (Android Design Challenge. You know, where google challenged developers to make apps for the OS? Sort of flies in the face of google-produced proprietary, doesn't it?) and quite enjoy them. <br><br>Android isn't proprietary, either. It runs on the OpenMoko handset, on a number of HTC devices (the ATT Tilt, Nokia N810, OpenMoko Freerunner), which are offered by different carriers. It's not limited to t-mobile, they just released the first official device for a completely FREE OS for mobile devices.<br><br>Did your precious Apple do that? No? Hmm. Yes, well, clearly Google is the evil in this equation. Given that it's store has had non-google apps in it since before the handset even released. Those awful, awful people at Google.<br><br>You know what typically happens AFTER you hallucinate from drinking the cult's kool-aid, right?<br><br>I'll be the first to admit that the G1 is not perfect. The keys are too flush, the chin takes getting used to and certainly there are features missing I cannot fathom a reason for (data IM client), but as far as open-ness and proprietary data are concerned, it's a good two generations of handset above the competition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Said AT&T while Apple was holding a gun to their head...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 5:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh the hypocracy and BS coming from this man.<br>Exactly how is Android more closed than our beloved iPhone? The iPhone, which only ran Apple apps for an entire year, and the same phone that only lets you get apps that are approved and distributed by Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadow08]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 6th 2008 8:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh so the iphone was alright to take straight up but android isn't ready?  We see how it is!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2008 1:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[ATT is retarded - open up more?  The Android phones are the most open phones there are. How open does ATT Want it? Open enough to poke it with its bit T? :)<br><br>Id like to see some of their opinions about their other OPEN phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2008 6:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're probably using a new definition of open along the lines of "Google needs to open up the restrictions a little, giving us some truly open restrictions that allow us total freedom to restrict the user in any way we want, rather than their closed restrictions system that makes it hard for us to control the user in any way."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[squiggleslash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2008 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Not so fast: Android isn't coming to AT&amp;T just yet]]></title><link>http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://engmobdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Why is it that iPhone fans get so defensive when you bring up the G1? I was an early adopter with the original iPhone. It is a beautiful phone and it works well and my reasons for switching back to T-Mobile had far less to do with the phone than with AT&T. T-Mobile's customer service is awesome. AT&T's coverage in my city is not as good as T-Mobile's. It's not significantly worse, but when you consider that AT&T's plans are much more expensive it kind of makes you wonder why. Now, a great new phone comes on the scene and the iPhone people get threatened whenever it gets brought up on a blog. I think I understand why: they paid good money for the new "must have" status symbol and now the very possibility that it's not the coolest phone anymore makes them go into attack mode because they think a gadget's coolness makes THEM cool. It doesn't, by the way. You should own a phone because it works for you. I suspect the G1 will work very well for a lot of people. The iPhone just isn't the best choice for everyone.  I know most iPhone owners are not like this, but the ones that are seem to be the most vocal. Very annoying. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 4:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>